Showing posts with label green. Show all posts
Showing posts with label green. Show all posts

Monday, May 19, 2008

LISSA’S: A Houston News Article ~ SMART Shopping

I love HOUSTON for many reasons. Check out this story I found from chron.com (Houston's online newspaper). I don't see anywhere in Texoma doing something like this... again, why would they?? Texomites LIVE in Wal-Mart!!! ~ Melissa (a Houstonian in 2 weeks!!)



Shoppers buying peace of mind
Co-op caters to consumers who have a bone to pick with big retailers



2008 Houston Chronicle



No longer does Jennifer Stelly push a metal shopping cart down supermarket aisles. Instead, she carries a reusable bag to pick out produce — all grown organically by local farmers — in the three rows at the Central City Co-Op in Montrose.



"Generally speaking, I absolutely refuse to shop at Wal-Mart and I always try to go just as local as possible. ... I try to stay away from corporate America as much as possible," said Stelly, who quit her engineering job four years ago to open an energy-medicine business.



Stelly said she prefers family-owned businesses to chain stores. She and friends purchase wholesale natural and organic products from a buying club that provides free shipping if they purchase more than $250 worth.



She is one of a growing number of consumers who have altered their shopping habits on the basis of their politics, moral and ethical beliefs, as well as concerns about human-rights or free-trade grounds.



Known commonly as moral purchasing or ethical consumerism, the practice involves buying things that are made without harm or exploitation of animals, laborers or the environment.





Jennifer Stelly, left, lifts a carton of organically grown tomatoes for Kerry Smith at the Central City Co-Op in Houston. The co-op caters to a growing trend of people exercising ethical consumerism.





Voting with their feet

Some, like Stelly, prefer to shop at area businesses not only to support the local economy, but also to avoid the costs and effects of the fuel used to transport products to Houston.



It is not a new idea. Consumers always have voted with their feet, shopping at retailers that offered the best price or the best service.



So-called "socially responsible" mutual funds that allow people to make investments that exclude certain kinds of companies, such as cigarette manufacturers, or firms that do not follow one's religious beliefs, have been popular for years.



And national exhortations to avoid certain products, from table grapes to products tested on animals, come and go.



Over the years, people have expanded their concerns by refusing to shop at companies and their suppliers that have poor records of protecting the environment, that purchase goods from foreign countries or that do not use Fair Trade-certified products.



Even illegal immigration has been raised as a reason to avoid a particular retailer. Last month's raid and roundup of illegal immigrants at a Shipley Do-Nuts office warehouse in near-north Houston prompted several commenters on the Houston Chronicle's Web site to say they would stop visiting the popular bakery.



Similarly, negative news about products made in China — including lead-tainted toys, melamine-tainted pet food, and toothpaste laced with antifreeze — have some shoppers leery of that country's merchandise.



Liana Winkler, visiting the Taft Street location of the Central City Co-Op for the first time last week, said she does not buy food grown in China and other countries.



"When I look at all the frozen food, it says 'Made in China,' " she said. "And I don't want to eat food where I don't know what they are fertilized with. I don't know where they are grown. I don't know whether they are made with slave labor."





Green initiatives

The moral-purchasing debate is widely discussed on Internet sites such as www.walmartwatch.com, a group devoted mainly to forcing the world's largest retailer to provide better wages and benefits for its employees.



"The bigger the company you are, probably the bigger the target you have on your back," said Scott Krugman, a spokesman with the Washington-based National Retail Federation, which represents 1.6 million retailers nationwide. "You can let other people tell your story for you, or you can take the responsibility to tell that story yourself. And that's what companies should be doing."



Wal-Mart, he said, is one of the pioneers in green initiatives with its efforts to assure that stores and their suppliers are environmentally friendly and energy efficient.



Wal-Mart officials did not return several phone calls for comment.





Bad publicity is costly

Meanwhile, Starbucks has had to defend itself against accusations that it does not buy "fair-trade" coffee. The movement is an organized effort to ensure that small growers in other countries are paid enough for their products to provide a decent living.



A Starbucks spokesman denied the charge and issued a statement saying the company "has a longstanding commitment of conducting business in an ethical and responsible manner."



Krugman said it is difficult to put a dollar amount on how much companies lose from bad publicity.



Al Norman, founder of www.sprawl-busters.com, a nationwide movement to stop construction of big-box stores such as Wal-Mart, The Home Depot, Kohl's, Target and Lowe's Home Improvement, said the impact of citizens not shopping at stores is small compared to the legal fees incurred when groups tie up store construction in courts or in planning hearings.



"Building a store four or five times the size of a football field ruins the neighborhood feel for many people who aren't interested in cheap underwear," he said. "A small-town quality of life is not sold at any Wal-Mart. And once they take it away from you, they can't sell it back at any price."



Jill Sundie, an assistant professor of marketing and entrepreneurship at the University of Houston's Bauer College of Business, said consumers pay attention when there is negative news about a company, including the use of child labor or the abuse of its own employees.



"Certainly," she said, "you see consumers responding in terms of not shopping at certain outlets, not buying certain types of products or hiring people for services if they have violated some moral or ethical guidelines."





Food is locally grown

However, Sundie said, not all consumers can afford to adjust their shopping habits because the alternative could force them to pay more for products. Some will continue to shop at stores, she said, regardless of the companies' reputations.



Stelly said she spends less now. She said she volunteers at the co-op, which allows her to get some of her fruits and vegetables free. Items at the buying club — where she gets organic, sustainable or fair-trade dry foods, household products and health-care items — are sold at wholesale prices.



At the Central City Co-Op on Taft Street, some shoppers said they participate because the food is locally grown, organic and healthier.



Victoria Lugwin, who shops there every week, said she tries not to patronize stores that have what she considers ethical problems. Also, she tries to buy seafood that comes from the United States because she said this country takes better care of its waters.



"I think that not only supporting local agriculture, but also eating local agriculture is good for the farmers and good for the people eating the food," she said.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

LISSA’S: Wal Mart green? Uh, don’t think so...

The reports of Wal-Mart's green business model are greatly exaggerated.

Three weeks ago, Wal-Mart unveiled a new Earth Month 'merchandising and marketing campaign' in an official press release. While Wal-Mart claims the marketing blitz 'takes 'going green' mainstream,' the campaign's keystone is a massive buy of print advertisements, weighing in at nearly one third of a billion pages.

I don't believe a mountain of wasted wood pulp celebrates the spirit of Earth Day. Wal-Mart's recent ad buy flies in the face of its promise to produce 'zero waste.' It seems clear that Wal-Mart's 'Earth Month' promotion is just one symptom of a broader problem? Wal-Mart is greenwashing, and it is getting away with it.

In spite of all the 'green' hype at Wal-Mart, the company's business model presents serious environmental shortfalls. The long-anticipated Wal-Mart sustainability report cited a significant global increase in CO2 emissions in 2006, after the company's green campaign began. Even worse, at a recent conference, Wal-Mart's CEO Lee Scott flatly declared 'we are not green' to an audience of economists. Despite these facts, Wal-Mart continues to generate positive headlines with it's enviro-marketing.

I agree with Mr. Scott. Wal-Mart is not a green company. I, for one, would welcome a serious investigation of Wal-Mart's performance as a steward of the environment.

Friday, February 15, 2008

LISSA’S: I’m Green, just don’t look

Recently, Wal-Mart has been trying to stress to everyone about how environmentally friendly they have become. They want to be considered the "Green" store. But there is still an ugly truth to the corporate giant.


According to The Post and Courier, Charleston, South Carolina, outside of Charleston, is an area called James Island. Wal-Mart is planning on building a new store at this location. They are having to get Government permits to build here. Sadly, the first permit has been granted. They are now authorized to be able to cut down 30 grand trees in protected land. They are now just waiting for their second permit. This permit will give them the rights to fill in 3 acres of protected wetlands. James Island already has a 123,000 square foot facility, but Wal-Mart wants to expand to 176,000 square foot. Instead of adding on to the existing building, they would rather destroy protected wetlands. But they have agreed to demolish the older location. So, wetlands are being destroyed for basically no reason. To add insult to injury, the location is directly behind the existing Wal-Mart.


So, Green is only a means of saving the environment that they cannot use for themselves and to get customer loyality. Taking this same idea to the Sherman Wal-Mart store. When Wal-Mart first began the whole Green issue and what each employee could do, they put a large poster in the break room. This poster detailed how this one store would recycle a certain amount of cardboard, plastic and aluminum in the final six months of the year. They were supposed to fill it in to show how they were approaching their goal. But this is where it ended. The poster was hung. The pledge in tons of cardboard, aluminum, and plastic were filled in, but never updated. The year has ended, and the end results: zeroes across the board. Nothing done.


So, there it is. Wal-Mart: Green while you are looking, but not caring when you are not.